Opposition to Building a New Women’s Prison In Massachusetts

Why We Don’t Need a New Women’s Prison

Click for a downloadable memo

 

  • The large majority of incarcerated women are poor, have serious health challenges, are victims of gendered violence, and experience housing insecurity. Incarceration caused further harm to these women. See: Women Who Cycle Through Jails and Prisons in Massachusetts
  • Despite the government’s interest in constructing a “trauma-informed” carceral facility, studies make it clear that prison is not an appropriate or effective setting for medical, substance use, or mental health treatment. See: How Incarceration Harms Women
  • There are multiple points at which women can and should be diverted from incarceration. See: Alternatives to Incarceration
  • The process to award a design contract for the proposed women’s prison has been deeply flawed from the beginning. See: Media Coverage Below

The Commonwealth of Massachusetts is facing a critical juncture as the Department of Correction (DOC) and the Division of Capital Asset Management and Maintenance (DCAMM) move forward with a plan for a new women’s prison. Touted as a “trauma-informed” and therapeutic facility for women, the prison project has a price tag of at least $50,000,000. That is in addition to the $162,000 per woman per year cost to incarcerate.

As academics, attorneys and social workers we are concerned that the proposed prison project is fiscally irresponsible, harmful to women and their families, and inherently unable to meet the project’s stated goal of being “trauma-informed.” We are further troubled by the lack of transparency and input from formerly-incarcerated women and other people directly impacted by incarceration, as well as from experts who work and conduct research in the criminal justice system, and from state and local legislators.

Unwarranted Restrictions, Gratuitous Harm — Women and Prison Security Classification in Massachusetts (August 2024)

Sered’s research shows that the Massachusetts Department of Correction (DOC) routinely incarcerates women in settings that are more restrictive than necessitated either by the very low rate of violence among incarcerated women or by Massachusetts law which affords the Commissioner of the Department of Correction nearly unlimited discretion to set security classification policies and procedures. Click here to read a one-page summary of Sered’s research and here to read her full report.

This document reviews the “Strategic Plan for Women Who Are Incarcerated in Massachusetts” submitted by the Ripples Group to the Massachusetts Division of Capital Asset Management and Maintenance (DCAMM) on June 21, 2022. The purpose of this review is to provide policy-makers and the public with a detailed understanding of the Strategic Plan’s shortcomings.

The 7 Key problems with the Strategic Plan
  1. Methodological shortcomings regarding both synthesizing relevant literature and engaging appropriate experts.
  2. Superficial understanding of trauma; disregard of critical factors such as racism and structural violence.
  3. Failure to consider options other than incarceration.
  4. Negligible consideration of assessments and outcomes of current Department of Correction (DOC) healthcare and other programs.
  5. Lack of knowledge of relevant state laws.
  6. Absence of strategies to overcome institutional obstacles such as ongoing opposition to change on the part of the DOC and the powerful correctional workers union.
  7. Little to no elaboration of how crucial parts of the strategic plan would be implemented.

The number of women incarcerated in Massachusetts has steadily declined over the past decades. There currently are under 200 women housed at MCI-Framingham. Our research shows that the vast majority of currently incarcerated women could be released right away under existing statutes.

Current statutes are broad enough to encompass a complete re-envisioning of how this state can or should respond to individuals convicted of violating the state’s criminal laws in the twenty-first century.

  • Neither the government nor the architectural firm (HDR) selected to design the new women’s prison provide evidence-based research demonstrating that prison can be an effective setting for healing from trauma. This report reviews the sources cited by the government and by HDR.

Women, Incarceration, and Violent Crime: A Briefing in Response to Plans for Building a New Women’s Prison in Massachusetts (September 2021)

Click here for a downloadable memo of the full report

The population of women incarcerated for crimes labeled as violent has emerged as a sticking point in efforts to balance concerns for public safety with the rights and well-being of women and communities most impacted by pro-incarceration policies of the late 20th and 21st centuries. To explore whether these concerns are grounded in the facts, we prepared a briefing that presents an overview of the scholarly literature on women, violence, and crime as well as stories of real women who have been incarcerated for crimes classified as violent in Massachusetts.

Key Points

● Classification of acts into “violent” and “non-violent” is inconsistent in American law and practice, and has problematic racial and gender implications.
● Women have very low rates of arrests and convictions for violent crimes.
● Women are more likely to be victims than perpetrators of violent crimes.
● Women who commit violent crimes usually do so in the context of household or intimate partner abuse.
● Women released from prison after serving time for violent crimes are unlikely to commit a subsequent violent crime.

Women and Violent Crime: Do the Facts Justify Building a New Women’s Prison in Massachusetts? Fact Sheet (September 2021)

● It is highly unlikely that spending $50 million on new construction to incarcerate a small population of women will contribute to public safety or the well-being of women and families.

Click here for a downloadable memo of the fact sheet

Beware the Healthier Cage (August 2023)

“The inability and unwillingness [of counties and states] to develop robust alternatives [to incarceration] shows us the values, or lack thereof, of the punishment bureaucracy and that carceral spaces are fundamentally ill-suited to provide a therapeutic environment, let alone evidence-based care.”

WIP Members’ Testimony at Legislative and Other Public Hearing

“No Women’s Prison Movement” PowerPoint presentation — Criminal Justice Reform Caucus Briefing, March 31, 2021, Facebook Live recording starting at minute 33:42 (requires Facebook account)

Concerns with Special Commission on Correctional Funding Report — April 11, 2022

Testimony on data collection from October 25, 2021 hearing before the Executive Office of Public Safety and Security

Testimony from July 20, 2021 hearing before the State Administration and Regulatory Oversight Committees

Public Documents Related to the New Prison Plan

HDR Study and Schematic Design Work Plan for Department of Correction Study and Design of Correctional Center for Women November 17, 2022 (released January 12, 2023)

Existing Conditions Report: Analyzing Three Sites for a New Women’s Prison (redacted and released February 26, 2023)

PowerPoint presentation of the architectural firm selected by the Massachusetts Designer Selection Board to design the new prison

Massachusetts Division of Capital Asset Management and Maintenance (DCAMM) Requests for Proposals (RFPs)