Obama on Climate Change plans

The climate change is quickly becoming a problem than can no longer be ignored. The rising temperatures and extreme weather are just the beginning of an environmental crisis. While some efforts have been made in the past, not much progress has been made. In order to significantly reduce carbon emissions and rising CO2 levels drastic measures have to be taken. In an attempt to make changes, the Environmental Protection Agency is working closely with the White House to create and implement a “Clean Power Plan.”

With the negative effects of climate change already becoming evident, president Obama feels the obligation to try and turn things around. According to WhiteHouse.gov, this new clean power plan will establish standards to limit carbon pollution from power plants. Unlike the previous soot and toxic emission standards, no rules on carbon pollution have been previously set. The planners are optimistic that 32 percent of carbon pollution will be eliminated by 2030. The plan is structured, however flexible and will be designed according to state. The Clean Power Plan will create policies that will create significant public health benefits. This plan will also provide tens of thousands of jobs for people willing to ensure grid reliability. This plan also encourages people to invest in green energy, hopefully creating a 30 percent increase in renewable technologies. Wind and solar energy is going to be highly encouraged. Programs will be put in place to make this more affordable to low-income communities.

The plan will allow each state to choose how they establish the methods to reach the new carbon emission standards. Each state is to come up with a plan within a certain amount, however if a state needs more time they are allowed to request an extension of up to two years. This new plan is encouraging investments in clean energy. This is going to save a lot of money for people on their energy bills. This plan will reward states for early investment in clean energy. The program wants to prioritize early investments for low-Income communities by awarding federal funding. These incentives will make renewable energy further develop. Standards for lights and heavy-duty vehicles will be required as the second phase of the fuel efficiency and greenhouse gas standards. Making solar power available for all families and communities to help cut energy bills, create jobs, and create more efficient households. Drastic measures are being taken by the EPA and other agencies to try and cut methane emissions from oil and gas systems, coal mining, landfills and agriculture.

President Obama met with President Xi Jinping to discuss reducing greenhouse gas emissions. Both parties agreed to significantly reduced emissions by 2030. This meeting was considered groundbreaking, considering both the U.S and China are the two largest polluters of greenhouse gases. This meeting has led to the increased pressure for every nation on earth to sign the same deal, at a United Nations summit meeting in Paris this coming fall. These two countries will lead the efforts and hopefully every other country will follow their example. Both the United States and China have submitted detailed plans to heavily reduce emissions.

Xi Jinping made Chinese history by being the first to stop it’s growth of carbon pollution when he agreed to cap the rapidly rising emissions within the next 15 years. This country wins world’s top emitter of carbon dioxide. This was something taken from the United States in 2006. More than a quarter of the world’s greenhouse gas emissions can be credited to China in 2012. This resulted from buring coal, oil, and natural gases. This was not much greater than the 14 percent that the united states contributed.

https://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2015/08/03/fact-sheet-president-obama-announce-historic-carbon-pollution-standards

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/09/16/us/us-and-chinese-climate-change-negotiators-to-meet-in-los-angeles.html?_r=0

http://www.ibtimes.com/us-china-climate-change-deal-presidents-obama-xi-discuss-emissions-goals-white-house-2107277

Intro to Lego Mindstorm

The use of the Lego Mindstorm robot is allowing student to get a feel for how technology is both assembled and functional. This experiment requires the student to assembly the simple device and program it using online software. This type of hands on activity is beneficial in showing the possibilities of more advanced equipment. Technology is a huge aspect of everyone’s life and is only going to increase as we progress into the future. This basic knowledge is a small window into the complex world of new, innovative technology. The basic principles that allow the functionality of the lego Mindstorm apply to all technology ranging from cars to spaceships.
As part of the lesson, we were given basic background knowledge that included unit conversions and finding percent error. This experiment used meters as the primary unit after being converted from inches. Revolutions and degrees was also used to find the degrees the wheels rotated as well as the number of turns of the wheel.
The first thing we were asked to do was find the circumference of the wheel on the Lego Mindstorm. This measurement is found by using the formula c=2πr or c= diameter*π. The measurement found was about 17 centimeters or .17 meters. For the first test we were asked to make the robot move and record the distance. This test was using a power level of 75%. In one second the car wheels rotated 564 degrees. This is equal to 1.57 revolutions. This is because you divide the degrees rotated by that of a circle, 360 degrees. After a second of movement the car traveled 28.5 centimeters, which was converted to .285 meters. The online computer simulator predicted that the car would travel .266 meters. This caused a percent error of 6.89%. This is the number measured-computer simulated divided by the average of two.
A second and third trial were performed to get more data at different power levels. At 70% power the car moved .265 meters and the computer simulated was .2488. This resulted in a percent error of 6.31%. The third trial at 60% resulted in the car traveling .230 meters, while the computer guess it would travel .210 meters. This was a percent error of 9.1%

 

 

Trial 1 Trial 2 Trial 3
Power level 75.00% 70.00% 60.00%
Measured distance (m) 0.285m 0.265m 0.230m
Computer simulated distance (m) 0.266m 0.2488m 0.210m
(measured-computer)/

average

0.069

0.063

0.091

Percent error (%)

6.896%

6.306%

9.091%

“A Lonely Quest for Facts on Genetically Modified Crops”

A bill in Hawaii was introduced in 2013 to ban genetically engineered crops from the island. There was a lot of support from the locals. There were many reports of disease and illness associated with the genetically modified organisms. There was a rise in allergies, super weeds, contaminations, cancer in rats, and the disappearance of butterflies and bees. Some of the council member were unclear about what GMO’s were, and did not understand the potential hazards. Many people wanted Hawaii to be a “G.M.O.-free oasis.” To the staff unaware of the negatives, a simple google search would inform anyone of the potential damage of GMO’s.
The problem with the bill passing was in the doubts of the councilman seeing some of the positive benefits of GMO’s. An genetically engineered variety of papaya saved the islands supply from a disease that would have been potentially devastating. Even some of the reports of GMO’s causing tumors in rats was not proven true. University of Hawaii biologists claimed that genetically engineered crops are no riskier than normal crops, in fact may have positive benefits.
The sponsor of the ban of GMO’s pushed the urgency of the problem. She warned to “act before it’s too late,”. However by banning all new research the possibility of creating more efficiency when growing healthy food during a time of urgency with global warming and increased population. Much of the opposition to GMO’s is compared to the rejection of climate-change science. However this group of opposition is coming from strong liberals unlike climate change being rejected by conservatives.
Scientists have been called out for not assessing the environmental risks associated with some of the new developments they create.
The proposed bill would allow the two already present GMO crops to stay on the island,however $1,000 per day penalty would be fined to anyone trying to go against the bill to create new GMO crops. The information to sort through to make a decision on GMOs was vast and contradictory, it would take years to make an educated decision.
It was argued by G.M.O. Free Hawaii island which includes food activist and entrepreneurs said that the organisms weren’t healthy and may damage their reputation and prices. Another argument was made by a woman who’s child had terrible allergies until switching to a non-GMO diet.
The issue of ownership of certain seeds became a factor when a farmer was sued by Monsanto when patented seeds ended up in their fields by accident. Eventually Mr. Ilagan voted against the ban. He was met with some angry voters. Some very emotional reactions occurred causing a final vote. He eventually passed the bill based on the people who supported the ban.