Select Page

A Second Line of Defense for Public Officials Asserting Qualified Immunity: What “Extraordinary Circumstances” Prevent Officials from Knowing the Law Governing Their Conduct?

The qualified immunity defense shields public officials from liability for civil rights violations committed during the exercise of their official duties.  The defense, which the United States Supreme Court deems necessary for officials to perform their duties...

Constitutional Law and Criminal Procedure—Criminal Defendant Erroneously Denied First-Choice Counsel Entitled to Automatic Reversal of Conviction—United States v. Gonzalez-Lopez, 126 S. Ct. 2557 (2006)

The Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution provides that “[i]n all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right . . . to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defence.”  The United States Supreme Court has interpreted this guarantee to protect...

Tax Law—Railroads May Not Challenge a State’s Valuation Methodologies for Ad Valorum Tax Purposes Under the 4-R Act—CSX Transportation, Inc. v. State Board of Equalization, 472 F.3d 1281 (11th Cir. 2006)

Section 306 of the Railroad Revitalization and Regulatory Reform Act of 1976 (4-R Act) prohibits states from discriminatorily taxing railroad property.  The 4-R Act creates an exception to the Tax Injunction Act (TIA) by granting federal courts jurisdiction to hear...