Pandora’s Promise starts with environmentally involved people talking about whether they are pro- nuclear or not. The film focuses in what are the pros and cons of the use of nuclear energy to light up cities all around the world.
As the movie begins, they showed us how people started to think about the using of nuclear power further than for weapons. It shows how the perception of people all around the world was ,regarding this topic, which in its majority was negative. Most people when were asked about the nuclear activity had a negative response because the first thing they thought about it was bombs, weapons and lethal contamination. Even though nuclear power is known for been used for weapons it is not its only purpose. As the film goes on, we could see other purpose of it such as electricity. The positive side on creating electricity from nuclear power is that it uses fewer raw products for more energy. Comparing it with oil, if you release all the energy, one pound of uranium has it would be equal to 500 barrels of oil. Also, as they explained, the waste that nuclear plants leaves is less than the waste of both oil and coal.
All along Pandora’s Promise, we saw how people who were against the nuclear power actually start to change their minds. They talk about how some propaganda against nuclear power was made by oil companies to keep in business.
Chernobyl and Fukushima are the biggest and most famous nuclear disasters ever. People against nuclear power focus on these catastrophes to talk others into changing their minds about it but as the movie keeps going, they show us what the nuclear level of some cities around the world are. The unit for this measure is Microsieverts per hour. Here are some of the cities
Los Angeles: 0.09 Microsieverts per hour.
New York: 0.13 Microsieverts per hour.
Rio de Janeiro: 0.25 Microsieverts per hour.
New Hampshire: 0.30 Microsieverts per hour.
Over Pacific Ocean: 2.20 Microsieverts per hour.
Guarapari(Brazil): 30.84 Microsieverts per hour.
Chernobyl: 0.92 Microsieverts per hour.
What experts found out was that the nuclear level increases with altitude and that there’s no correlation with the background radioactivity. As a matter of fact, by the spring of 1986 people started to move in Chernobyl again, and they still live there. That people haven’t suffered from cancer or any other illness radioactive related. Also, many organizations confirm that there were less than 60 deaths caused by that radioactive disaster. This statement contradicts people who said that there were thousands of deaths. When those people were asked about this they had no response about it, they claim that it is all a big lie.
Moreover, a great example is France. A country that is almost completely green uses nuclear energy as electricity in a big part of the nation.
In the movie, we also were able to see that some of the nuclear waste can be and is being used to create fuel.
The final conclusion is that nuclear power can be the future for creating energy ,as electricity, without contaminating the environment.
Here are some pictures of Chernobyl:
Chernobyl’s nuclear plant:
Images from:
http://sites.lafayette.edu/egrs352-sp14-nuclear/files/2014/05/nuclearpowerpic.jpg
http://i.telegraph.co.uk/multimedia/archive/01876/19861001-aerial_1876307i.jpg
http://msnbcmedia.msn.com/i/MSNBC/Components/Slideshows/_production/ss-110421-chernobyl/ss-110425-chernobyl-004.jpg
I LOVE YOUR BLOG!!!. The way you described the movie is perfect because you did not leave out any details and it was informative. I like how you talked about the people who were anti-nuclear focused only on the disaster of Chernobyl and Fukushima. It was great that you explained the pros and cons of nuclear. Keep up the good work!!!!!!!