For our final experiment, we decided to perform a Hydro Power Water Wheel. The purpose of this experiment was to learn about energy.
The project consisted of several different parts that we set together to make our experiment work. We built a water wheel taking a rounded piece of pink foam board and placing about 20 plastic black spoons and 1 white around the radius of the circle, then taking a metal tube we inserted at the center of the wheel. This provided us with a base to place the wheel when needed to rotate. After completing the wheel we set the first trial. Setting up the experiment consisted of the water wheel, previously mentioned, and tall and deep container to pour the water in, a 73 cm long rubber stopper that we made out of a rubber drawing eraser. In addition to these main components, we also used a weight scale that allowed us to weight the mass of water, clamps to hold the wheel in place, and a ruler to measure the circumference of the wheel, distance for the water to travel and a stopwatch to calculate the time.
We decided to run the experiment for four (4) trials each one using a different mass of water this will allow us to calculate the power of water in each different amount. We first calculated the potential energy (PE) using the equation, mass x gravity x height. Then we calculated the velocity, V=Distance/Time. In order to calculate the kinetic energy (KE), KE=.5xmassxV^2, meant we would have to calculate the velocity. Once we had these results we calculated, by doing these calculations we learned that when the amount of water was bigger the number of rotation increased in less seconds
Overall, this experiment was educational and enjoyable, what it seemed to be very simple ended up being more complex that we though. In order to calculate and to obtain the desire results precision is a key during this process. We perform the experiment a number of times as trial and error, and then for what we called our “final” which is the one that gave us the best results however none of our trials were a 100% perfect. At the beginning we started doing the experiment; we realized that not having a funnel for the first few trials did not help us with the process as we also encounter a problem with the pouring of water. The first few trials our kinetic energy did not seem to be best result because for each trial even though we kept everything same the way we poured the water was not the same and that was changing our results. Luckily, after meeting with prof. Sonek we came to a conclusion than having a stopper would be the best way to measure the power of water because even though the amount of water will change for each trial the pressure will be “constant” in term that all the water will be released at once.
Even though, it was appositive experience we learns that not all experiments are perfect and that’s how science works, we have to try the experiment many times to get the best results out of our project, however we always found few errors with the calculation at the end that seemed to not reflect the right amount of power obtained from the waterwheel. Also, even thou this was a nice experiment and we had a lot to measure, in order for this method to properly work in the real works it needs to be a much bigger and better structured wheel and water flow to provide with a decent amount of energy, a nd even though this method is a good option for the environment it might not always be the best option because of the size it will require to get energy out of it.
Once, we had the opportunity to present the our project to class, it was good to see other students performing what we have “created” and work on for over 2 weeks, even though some students did not seem very motivated about the experiments in class we managed to get them involved and have fun while doing some science. This project is a hands on project which helps students to get together and solve different problems while learning and applying what we learn during this semester in class.
Water mass
|
Distance | Velocity | Rotations
|
Time | |
Trial 1 (Red)
|
.3825kg | 73cm | 6.91 m/s | 12 | 5 seconds |
Trial 2 (Green) | .2341kg | 73cm | 2.46 m/s | 9 | 14 seconds |
Trial 3 (Yellow) | .1104kg | 73cm | 9.87 m/s | 3 | 3.5 seconds |
Trial 4 (Black) | .0659kg | 73cm | 17.27 m/s | 2 | 2 seconds |
Potential energy (PE)
|
Mass x Gravity (9.807 m/s) x Height |
Trial 1 (Red)
|
273.83 Joules |
Trial 2 (Green)
|
167.59 Joules |
Trial 3 (Yellow)
|
79.03 Joules |
Trial 4 (Black)
|
47.17 Joules |
Kinetic Energy (KE)
|
.5 x Mass x (velocity)^2 |
Trial 1 (Red)
|
1.5853 Joules |
Trial 2 (Green)
|
.7083 Joules |
Trial 3 (Yellow)
|
5.3774 Joules |
Trial 4 (Black)
|
9.8274 Joules |
Power of spinning wheel
|
(.5 x 2.24 x velocity^3)/1,000 |
Trial 1 (Red)
|
.3690 watts |
Trial 2 (Green)
|
.01 watts |
Trial 3 (Yellow)
|
.0011 watts |
Trial 4 (Black)
|
.0057 watts |
Efficiency of water wheel
|
Pwheel / Pwater |
Trial 1 (Red)
|
2.38m^3/s |
Trial 2 (Green)
|
1.81 m^3/s |
Trial 3 (Yellow)
|
4.97 m^3/s |
Trial 4 (Black)
|
1.47 m^3/s |
Power of Water
|
(velocity x area) / 1,000 kg/m^3 |
Trial 1 (Red)
|
.0154 watts |
Trial 2 (Green)
|
.0055 watts |
Trial 3 (Yellow)
|
.0221 watts |
Trial 4 (Black)
|
.0386 watts |