Museum Trip

Last Tuesday we went on another adventure. This time to the Museum of Science! I for one was very excited because I haven’t been to the MOS in a loooong time.

Now this place has to be one of my favorite places, but due to time constraints, I was only able to see a little bit of what this place has to offer.  It is such an interesting place where you can learn all types of stuff, from animal life to plant life, to dinosaurs and the human body and planets and pretty much anything else you can imagine. I remember the first time I came here in 6th grade, and being simply amazed by everything. Even going there now I feel like my 11 year old self, a little childish and awestruck.

 

What I have decided to focus on was one exhibit that corresponded to our final project. One area was dedicated to alternative energy sources. The one in particular that caught my eye was solar energy, because  our final experiment has to do with heat and solar power. Below you will find some pictures of the charts they have. There are also dioramas of simply sunlight experiments.  One interesting fact I learned was that heating and cooling account for nearly half of the energy used in U.S households.

Team Experiment!

Unfortunately I missed out on the brainstorming portion of our experiment with Luana, Livia and Evan. From what I can gather from their posts we are going to use the Nxt robots to determine which surface conducts the most heat, whether it is sand, soil or water. This sounds like an awesome experiment, so good job guys!! I look forward to working with everyone!

Happy Science-ing!

That’s what I’m bloggin’ about.

The Indian Point Energy Center

A nice picturesque place in Buchanan, New York, right across from the Hudson River. There is a debate about whether or not to shut this power plant down. This nuclear power plant produces nuclear energy, which is considered clean energy, but at what cost? A short but powerful video really takes this debate up a notch. Chernobyl. Fukushima. Indian Point?

In this video they mention that 1 in 3 people live within 50 miles of a nuclear plant. And this particular plant is in an active seismic zone, meaning it is vulnerable to earthquakes.

The pros and cons of nuclear energy in general are as follows:

Pros:

  • Little pollution
  • Nuclear power plants need little fuel, so they are less vulnerable to shortages because of strikes or natural disasters.
  • Nuclear power is one the safest methods of producing energy. Each year, 10,000 to 50,000 Americans die from respiratory diseases due to the burning of coal, and 300 are killed in mining and transportation accidents.

Cons:

  • Meltdowns
  • Radiation
  • Waste Disposal

These pros and cons came from: The Pros and Cons of Nuclear Energy

While these are generic, there are also specific benefits and costs of shutting down the Indian Point Plant. Unsafe? talks about some of them.

MIT Plasma Center Tour

On February 28, 2012 we went on a long and treacherous journey.

(Okay, it wasn’t that bad. )

It was our trip to the MIT Plasma Science and Fusion Center. It was pretty cool! We had learned a lot about it in class previously but to see how passionate the people who were working on the project were about it made it even that much better.

The Plasma Center is recognized as one of the leading university research laboratories in the physics and engineering aspects of magnetic and inertial fusion.

Their machine, Alcator C-Mod, uses magnetic fields to confine hydrogen atoms and get them hot enough to fuse. This particular machine is a tokamak, which prevents the particles following the magnetic field lines from escaping. It looks similar to this:

They run their machines for a couple of seconds, and it takes almost the amount of energy that the entire city of Cambridge uses! The downside to this is that they use so much energy, but they do not make nearly enough of it back. MIT is working on it though, the hope for the future is to someday be able to produce much more energy and create an alternative energy source that is more economically and earthly sound.

 

On a sad note, this particular research center has got their funding cut, so more funding can go to ITER, another fusion machine, bigger and stronger. More info here: ITER. It is really sad because all of the members of the MIT Plasma Center have worked so hard and put so much time into it, and now they can’t continue. There is one thing we can do to help them though, a petition. An online petition is up and running to help MIT keep their funding. You can find out more information about the program here: http://www.fusionfuture.org/why-fusion-energy/intro-to-fusion/ and you can sign the petition here: Petition

Global Warming?

Fact or Fiction?

We have all heard about global warming and its effects on the Earth. Basically global warming is the climate change that is happening on the Earth at an increasing rate. Some  fun facts about global warming found at National Geographic are shown here:

• Average temperatures have climbed 1.4 degrees Fahrenheit (0.8 degree Celsius) around the world since 1880, much of this in recent decades, according to NASA’s Goddard Institute for Space Studies.

• The rate of warming is increasing. The 20th century’s last two decades were the hottest in 400 years and possibly the warmest for several millennia, according to a number of climate studies. And the United Nations’ Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) reports that 11 of the past 12 years are among the dozen warmest since 1850.

• The Arctic is feeling the effects the most. Average temperatures in Alaska, western Canada, and eastern Russia have risen at twice the global average, according to the multinational Arctic Climate Impact Assessment report compiled between 2000 and 2004.

• Arctic ice is rapidly disappearing, and the region may have its first completely ice-free summer by 2040 or earlier. Polar bears and indigenous cultures are already suffering from the sea-ice loss.

• Glaciers and mountain snows are rapidly melting—for example, Montana’s Glacier National Park now has only 27 glaciers, versus 150 in 1910. In the Northern Hemisphere, thaws also come a week earlier in spring and freezes begin a week later.

• Coral reefs, which are highly sensitive to small changes in water temperature, suffered the worst bleaching—or die-off in response to stress—ever recorded in 1998, with some areas seeing bleach rates of 70 percent. Experts expect these sorts of events to increase in frequency and intensity in the next 50 years as sea temperatures rise.

• An upsurge in the amount of extreme weather events, such as wildfires, heat waves, and strong tropical storms, is also attributed in part to climate change by some experts.

 

So based on these facts about our planet we are left to decide whether we acknowledge it is happening, choose to ignore it, or just call it a hoax. It may seem silly to call it a hoax, based on fact and reason, but we are not here to judge. We are here to simply share the views of people who consider themselves “deniers”. My opinion in this should not be taken into account, I am merely sharing the views of others.

One interesting website that I had found was : Global Warming Hoax. A website devoted entirely to debunking the global warming idea. I enjoyed their tag line for the website: “Where only the Truth heats up”, I thought it was humorous. Many global warming deniers believe that the science hasn’t been tested completely and that the science is mixed. Here is a comic that some deniers, or skeptics, believe explains where they are coming from:

There is actually a petition going around that scientists can sign stating that global warming is not man-made and it could actually be good for us. Here is what the petition looks like from Global Warming Petition Project:

So what do you think? Can global warming actually be good for us? And are we not actually the main cause?

Tom Vales

Today we didn’t do an experiment like the previous classes, but we did see some experiments and had Tom Vales there to show us how they worked.

It was awesome!

The first was the Peltier Device, which is still used today. It was first used in 1834. It involves putting one leg in cold water and one in hot. The only draw back is that it is below 20% efficiency. It works as  “a solid-state active heat pump which transfers heat from one side of the device to the other side against the temperature gradient (from cold to hot), with consumption of electrical energy.”

This is basically what it is like:

Except in our class it was almost like a fork and one leg was in a cup of cold water and another in the cup of warm water. Towards the end of class it stopped working because the hot water cooled down and the cold became room temperature.

The next device he showed was the Mendocino Motor Calibrator.

“The motor consists of a four-sided (square cross-section) rotor block in the middle of a shaft. The rotor block has two sets of windings and a solar cell attached to each side. The shaft is positioned horizontally and has a magnet at each end. The magnets on the shaft provide levitation by repelling magnets in a base under the motor. There is an additional magnet that sits under the rotor block and provides a magnetic field for the rotor.”

“When light strikes one of the solar cells, it generates an electric current thus energizing one of the rotor windings. This produces a magnetic field which interacts with the field of the magnet under the rotor. This interaction causes the rotor to turn. As the rotor rotates, the next solar cell moves into the light and energizes the second winding, creating a current in an opposite direction to the first thus maintaining the rotation. This process repeats as the motor spins.”

It looked very similar to this: This one was my favorite!

The last thing we were shown was the Tesla Coil. “A Tesla coil is a type of resonant transformer circuit invented by Nikola Tesla around 1891. It is used to produce high voltage, low current, high frequency alternating current electricity. Tesla coils produce higher current than the other source of high voltage discharges, electrostatic machines.” A Tesla coil looks like this:

 

Source: Wikipedia

Scandalous!

Solyndra was a company that had manufactured solar panels. A green company, trying to better the world.

So what happened?


In 2010 Obama visited the company, while they were still under construction. Solydra was getting $535 million worth of loan guarantees from the Obama administration.  Not too long after the loan, the company went bankrupt. BANKRUPT!


So the real question is, where did all that money go? Two top executives of the company were brought to court and asked what had happened, they pleaded the 5th.

They claim to respectively not answer any questions. Which is constitutional, but unfair to all the tax payers, whose money they essentially stole.

 

An interesting take on the matter is the Five Myths of the Solyndra Collapse.

These myths range from pointing the finger to other pitfalls and eventually blaming China for the whole thing 0.O

 

Sources: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D6sNFtoG6HU, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lczSqZ2quT8&feature=related, http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/ezra-klein/post/five-myths-about-the-solyndra-collapse/2011/09/14/gIQAfkyvRK_blog.html

Solar Energy

There are many alternative ways to get energy. Some examples are wind energy and solar energy. Anyone know why wind energy is so popular?It has a lot of fans!

Now that that’s over. We did an experiment last class involving light sensors. We attached our robot brain to the computer from Port 1. From port A we attached the light panel.

We then got flashlights and places them at varying distances away from the panel. The Lab View then recorded the data onto an excel worksheet (So Convenient!). After we did 5 trials, the first being no light, the next four were 5, 10, 15, 20 cm away. We had recorded the average and graphed the results. Here is what that looked like:

As you can see, the further the light was from the panel, the less voltage it produced.

Next we picked a constant distance (5cm) and put colored lenses over the light source. Then we tested which produced the most voltage. Shown here:

 

As we can see from this chart, the lighter the color, the more voltage. The dark blue gave the least voltage. The neon green actually gave more voltage than the regular light with no colored lens. I wonder why that is?

Hey Ya!

So immediately when I heard how we were completely this experiment today I thought of the popular song “Hey Ya” by OutKast. And then I thought of this: Obadiah Parker

 

Anywho,

Our most recent experiment involved a clear flashlight attached to the robot brain which was then connected to the computer.

We created battery charge by moving the magnet back and forth through the copper coils. To do this we needed to shake the flashlight up and down.

The LabView collected the data and put it into an Excel Spreadsheet for easier readings. We did 4 runs, along with a trial run with 0 shakes.  Each test ran for 30 seconds, only the # of shakes and speed of shaking varied.

After gathering all the results, we needed to analyze the data and figure out the sum of the square for each trial. After analysis, we made another fun graph comparing the shakes to the sum of squares. We discovered a direct correlation as shakes increased, so did the sum of squares. Shown here:  Graph!

Say No to Frack.

Hydraulic fracturing, or more commonly: Hydrofracking

But what in the world is it?

In the simplest of terms, derived from Wikipedia, it is pumping chemicals into the ground, sometimes contaminating the water supply, in order to release natural gases from the ground. Wiki’s definition of Hydrofracking.

Here’s a familiar face explaining the dangers of hydrofracking: Mark Ruffalo! I think it’s awesome when celebrities get involved in environmental crises in order to raise awareness to people who may not actually know what is going on in the world…not saying that *I* would have any idea what that is like…

Anyways…

Many people are speaking out against hydrofracking because there is a danger to the water supply in the immediate area. Because of the drilling into the ground, toxins can be released into the water supply, leaving surrounding cities without clean tap water.

 

This picture below shows the basic outline of a fracking job:

What do you think? Can there be any good in fracking, and if so, does it outweigh the bad?