Not Exactly Battlebots

Friday 01/27 my partner and I did our Robotics experiment. At first we ran into some trouble when our robot wouldn’t start up. Once we got it going it appeared to be running backwards  as well as crookedly. After some adjustments we got it moving in a straight line.

We measured the wheel and determined it had a .15m diameter.

As we input different power levels into the program we recorded the following results:

1.

50 power RPM 758/761 NoT. 2.11 Distance .32 Velocity .32 (42 cm)

2.

75 power RPM 1,183/1,887  NoT. 3.3 Dostance .49 Velocity .49 (59 cm)

3.

25 power RPM 325/326 NoT. 90 Distance .14 Velocity .14 (20 cm)

We then calculated the error rate for each power level and the results were as follows:

1. 27.03%

2. 19%

3. 35.3%

 

 

 

Demand Response

I will be honest,  I groaned when I saw the topic for this blog. A Google image search rewarded me with only a plethora of graphs and charts and a handful of adverts and a video search didn’t  seem to offer up anything much more interesting.

I hope they are happy because they are saving electricity.

Okay lets give the topic a chance, maybe it is only uninteresting because I know so little and as Sir Francis Bacon said, knowledge is power. Tell me Electric man what exactly is Demand Response?

Electric man says “I am  shocked you have to ask.”

Hurhur   Electric man.  I don’t see Batman making puns like that. But seriously…

“Well,” says Electric Man ” Most of us live on what we call the grid. This is where we get our electricity from. Occasionally the “demand” for electricity exceeds what the power plants feeding the grid can supply and something has to be done.This is where the “response” bit comes in.”

Response huh? That sounds more immediate than long term energy conservation methods such as using energy star appliances or those new -fangled incandescent bulbs .

Electric Man says “It sure is. In this case Electricity consumers actively lower their power usage when the grid is being overly stressed, or in some cases supplement the grid using their own generators until the energy crisis has passed.”

(I found this explanation provided by PG&E helpful  http://www.pge.com/mybusiness/energysavingsrebates/demandresponse/whatisdemandresponse/ )

I think I have a better grasp now. Thanks Electric man, I can take it from here.Now that we have a better idea of what we are talking about lets look at one of those charts I mentioned earlier.Cpower is an energy management company that works with companies to optimize energy efficiency. The chart they provide on their website (shown above) shows how when the Grid becomes stressed the “client” or energy consumer can take actions to relieve the stress by shutting down elevators, “pre-cool” the building and turn off excess lighting. The graph below the images shows the load on the grid being lightened (though I am guessing this is due to multiple sources of high energy consumption taking action, not just one).

Wikipedia’s Demand Response page (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demand_response ) talks about how there are three different types of demand response.

1. Emergency Demand Response- This demand response is used in, hm, oh yes, emergency type situations,  As mentioned earlier it is employed when the grid or parts of the grid  is in danger of losing power because of “peak demand”.

2. Economic demand response- This demand response allows companies, manufacturers, etc. to use less power when the power they would be using outweighs the amount of profit they would gain from not using the excess power.

3. Ancillary services demand response- “consists of a number of specialty services that are needed to ensure the secure operation of the transmission grid and which have traditionally been provided by generators.”

The following video though terrible, illustrates how automated demand response systems work.

demand response

Alright, clearly demand response is a pretty well thought out method for dealing with our society’s high power demands. I wonder though if we implement more long term power saving methods like the ones I mentioned earlier, if we will even have to worry about Demand Response in the long term? What about if we feed the grid?  Personally, I have always liked the idea of everyone feeding the grid through the use of  solar power. This method would take the greatest burden off the grid. I know that some governments including ours are working towards implementing this idea.

Well, although demand response isn’t exactly riveting, I feel better having some idea of what exactly it means and can hopefully apply it to larger contexts in the future and as G.I Joe says,

Knowing is half the battle.(the other half is apparently red and blue lasers.)

Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Disaster

It was through NPR that I first heard about the Nuclear disaster at Fukushima. The earthquake, the biggest to hit Japan since 1923,  struck on March 11, 2011 and the reactors that were not already off  at the Fukushima power plant had to be shut down. Then the tsunami hit making a bad situation worse by knocking out the generators that were meant to keep the reactors cool in case of emergency.

This video by ABC News  provides a comprehensive illustration of what went wrong at the plant.

Fukushima Nuclear Disaster

Despite the video’s title “Playing With Fire” Nuclear energy is in fact usually quite safe. Should /could have Japan done something to help prevent a bad situation from becoming worse? Some authorities seem to think so.

“International nuclear inspectors have criticized the operator of the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear plant for failing to prepare for a tsunami of the size that slammed into the facility on 11 March, sparking the world’s worst nuclear crisis since Chernobyl.” http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2011/jun/01/fukushima-plant-criticised-nuclear-inspectors

But what of the aftermath? Last December the plant was put into what is called a cold shutdown, the authorities claiming that it is quite safe. Many displaced citizens are refusing however, to move back to what they consider an unsafe area.

The following link explains that the citizens may in fact be right as the plant is still not entirely stable and is leaking tons of radiated water.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/asia_pacific/japan-declares-fukushima-daiichi-nuclear-plant-stable/2011/12/16/gIQA36EZxO_story.html

I wouldn’t want to move back either.

Evacuation zones.

It is clear this disaster is going to have long term negative effects and can not be swept under the carpet as easily as some authorities seem to wish it could be. Not only are many Japanese citizens still without homes but the production of food, especially of rice a dietary staple in Japan, has been massively affected by the Fukushima Nuclear disaster, which in turn effects the countries’ economy.

See the following link for an article by Lucy Craft (NPR) that deals with food fears as well as the psychological impact  of the disaster on the Japanese people.

http://www.npr.org/2011/12/24/144194589/in-japan-radiation-fears-reshape-lives

The quality of water is still being debated and authorities talk of “tagging” children with radiation monitors to see if it is still safe for them to live in the area surrounding the plant. This angers parents who would rather see their children and pregnant women evacuated from the area.

http://www.npr.org/2011/06/15/137192592/japanese-kids-in-fukushima-to-receive-radiation-detectors

Time will only tell how severe the environmental damage is. For now there are already claims of the radiation making mutated bunnies. We can only hope that nature has a few tricks up her sleeve to help with the cure.

Look Familiar?